Some updates-
thinking about going to grad school in North Carolina in 2010. A few of my professors (including one of my favorites) suggested I look at the program and visit the campus.
we're for sure going to Jamaica next fall (2009). I don't know how long we'll stay, though. Depends on more than what's in our control.
speaking of control, my class (Class, Status, and Power) is getting interesting. We just finished talking about Domhoff and Marxism. More to come later.
Now, I've been thinking about what to read next. I'm starting "Soft Power" by Joseph Nye and it's really interesting. I think I may reread the Harry Potter series to counterbalance my brain exploding with such technical jargon that Nye throws in. We'll see. Only so much time and unfortunately I need sleep.
Anyway, I've been thinking about how the Church views homosexuality recently. Sure, if I say that I support gay marriage, I'll be crucified, but I want to suggest something I've talked with a friends about before.
What are we saying when we (Christians) say we don't support gay marriage? Are we saying that marriage is sacred and to be only thought of in the scriptural sense? If that's the case, then why is the government involved? It seems like the only leadership in marriage should be that of God and not of the State, yes? Maybe I'm off. I think that when we say we don't support gay marriage, what we're actually saying to homosexuals is that we don't think you deserve the same rights as us (heterosexuals) because you are living a life of sin...
Seems a little arrogant, doesn't it? I'm not saying that marriage necessarily has to encompass homosexuals - but by saying that homosexuals do not deserve the same rights and privileges that heterosexuals receive from our government is heterosexism.
Speaking of deserving - do we actually deserve the rights that come along with marriage (legally recognized as a unit, tax credits, lawful rights)? No. I think (and have not thought about this too hard, mind you) that a sin is a sin. If a homosexual couple does not deserve the same rights as a "traditional" couple because they are sexually sinning, then I'm pretty sure that none of us deserve ANYTHING because we are all sinners.
So, this is what I propose - make marriage something only the Church can designate and make it only a title before God (not some legally binding agreement). For all government purposes have "civil unions" - for everyone, heterosexual or otherwise. It just isn't fair that someone is pointed out and discriminated against because of his/her sexuality, when at the same time, the person pointing the finger and discriminating has some skeletons in his/her closet, too. And furthermore, it's unloving. We're only make the gap between "them" and "us" bigger! How are we to help those that are lost, when we refuse to help them with things that affecting their lives! I think it's like saying we would help the poor, but they really need to change their life first. It isn't fair. And it isn't biblical.
This is very ramble-y. Sorry about that. Just something I've been thinking about.
2 comments:
I'm curious, are you advocating that gay marriage is okay before God or just that you think the government ought to recognize gay marriage. I think those are two different issues.
That gov't should recognize it. I think that the term "civil union" should be used for everyone in regards to the government. Does that make any sense??
Post a Comment